Curses in Aeschylus’ Seven Against Thebes and in Shakespeare’s Richard Plays
Keywords:Aeschylus, Shakespeare, Seven Against Thebes, Richard II, Richard III, curses
Despite differences in theatrical convention and cultural context, Aeschylus’ Seven Against Thebes and Shakespeare’s Richard II and Richard III share important similarities: each occurs in a sequence of plays and features a ruler who, initially sure of himself, suffers a crashing downfall and death. Variously represented, curses, that is, callings for supernatural punishment upon people, appear centrally in these plays and structure their unfolding actions. Aeschylus’ play presents the fulfillment of Oedipus’ curse on his sons, Eteocles and Polyneices. Eteocles’ confrontation with the curse both enables its fulfillment and defines his tragedy. Contrarily, characters curse each other in Richard II, but they do so ineffectually. In this play God’s curse in Genesis structures and defines the action. Margaret’s curses appear efficacious in Richard III but actually just serve to indicate the potent reality of divine retribution. In Shakespeare’s plays confrontation with curses enable their fulfillment and constitutes the rulers’ tragedies. Notice of the agency and operation of curses in these three plays reveals the different theologies, dramas, and tragedies they present.
Aeschylus (1972), Aeschyli Septem Quae Supersunt Tragoediae, ed. by Denys Page, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Aristotle (1995), Aristotle Poetics, Longinus On the Sublime, Demetrius On Style, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press. [Aristotle translation by Stephen Halliwell]
Bacon, Helen H. (1964), “The Shield of Eteocles,” Arion 3 (3): 27-38.
Brumble, H. David (1998), Classical Myths and Legends in the Middle Ages and Renaissance: A Dictionary of Allegorical Meanings, London: Fitzroy Dearborn.
Bryant, Jr., J. A. (1957), “The Linked Analogies of Richard II,” The Sewanee Review 65 (3): 420-33.
Day, Gilllian (2002), Shakespeare at Stratford: King Richard III, London: Thomson Learning.
Geneva Bible 1599, Bible Gateway https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+4&version=GNV (last access 20 September 2017).
Grossman, Edwina Booth (1894, rpt. 1969), Edwin Booth: Recollections by his Daughter Edwina Booth Grossman, New York: Benjamin Blom.
Hamlin, Hannibal (2013), The Bible in Shakespeare, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hutchinson, G. O. (ed.) (1985), Aeschylus Septem Contra Thebas, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Maveety, Stanley R. (1973), “A Second Fall of Cursed Man: The Bold Metaphor in Richard II,” The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 72 (2): 175-93.
Scofield, Scott (2012), “Cain’s Crime of Secrecy and the Unknowable Book of Life: The Complexities of Biblical Referencing in Richard II,” in Travis DeCook and Alan Galey (eds.), Shakespeare, the Bible, and the Form of the Book: Contested Scriptures, New York: Routledge, 40-56.
Shakespeare, William (2002), King Richard II, ed. by Charles R. Forker, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
___ (2000), The Tragedy of King Richard III, ed. by John Jowett, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
___ (2009), Richard III, ed. by James R. Siemon, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Sommerstein, Alan H. (ed. and trans.) (2009), Oresteia: Agamemnon, Libation-Bearers, Eumenides, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Stehle, Eva (2005), “Prayer and Curse in Aeschylus’ Seven Against Thebes”, Classical Philology 100 (2): 101-22.
Streete, Adrian (2009), Protestantism and Drama in Early Modern England, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taplin, Oliver (1977), The Stagecraft of Aeschylus: The Dramatic Use of Exits and Entrances in Greek Tragedy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Torrance, Isabelle (2014), “Aeschylus: Seven Against Thebes”, in Hanna M. Roisman (ed.) The Encylopedia of Greek Tragedy, 3 vols., London: John Wiley & Sons, 1: 61-7.
Watson, Lindsay (1991), Arae: The Curse Poetry of Antiquity, Leeds: Francis Cairns.
West, Martin L. (ed. and trans.) (2003), Greek Epic Fragments: From the Seventh to the Fifth Centuries BC, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Winnington-Ingram, R. P. (1983), Studies in Aeschylus, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Copyright (c) 2018 Skenè. Journal of Theatre and Drama Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
This Journal is a CC-BY 4.0 publication (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This Licence allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this Journal, providing a link to the Licence and explicitly underlining any change (full mention of Issue number, year, pages and DOI is required).
- The Author retains (i) the rights to reproduce, to distribute, to publicly perform, and to publicly display the Article in any medium for any purpose; (ii) the right to prepare derivative works from the Article; and (iii) the right to authorise others to make any use of the Article so long as the Author receives credit as Author and the Journal in which the Article has been published are cited as the source of first publication of the Article. For example, the Author may make and distribute copies in the course of teaching and research and may post the Article on personal or institutional Web sites and in other open-access digital repositories.
- The Author is free to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Journal’s published version of the work, with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this Journal and explicitly underlining any change (full mention of Issue number, year, pages and DOI is required).
- The Author is permitted and encouraged to post their work online after the evaluation process has been successfully passed, as it can lead to productive exchanges as well as to a wider dissemination of the published work.