Nietzsche, Tragedy, and the Theory of Catharsis

Authors

  • James I. Porter UC Berkeley

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13136/sjtds.v2i1.45

Abstract

Nietzsche’s view of catharsis has attracted some but not a great deal of attention. Part of the reason is that he rarely makes use of the term itself, whether in his Birth of Tragedy or elsewhere, and when he does he is rather dismissive, seemingly rejecting out of hand the Aristotelian-inspired theory of tragic catharsis in its ancient or modern (notably, classicizing) forms. Catharsis would appear to be an unrewarding area for understanding Nietzsche. Nevertheless, it is undeniable that The Birth of Tragedy appears to foreground Nietzsche’s rejection of tragic catharsis in its classical form, and the book is surely very much about catharsis in this sense. As it happens, a closer look at both this work and a handful of later texts on tragedy in Nietzsche’s writings suggests that catharsis theory is everywhere on his mind even where the term is not being mentioned, not least of all in The Birth of Tragedy, where it is fully operative in the form of pity or co-suffering (Mitleid[en]), identificatory fear and horror (Furcht, Schrecken), and redemptive discharge (Erlösung, Entladung). Nor is his view as clear-cut as his emphatic rejection of Aristotelian catharsis might appear to indicate. His view of catharsis is neither simple nor entirely uniform across his corpus. Nietzsche’s understanding of catharsis proves to be much closer to the view he appears to reject, and much closer to classicism’s reading of tragedy than one might suppose.

Author Biography

  • James I. Porter, UC Berkeley
    Chancellor's Professor, Dept. of Rhetoric

References

Augustine (1992) Confessions, trans. Henry Chadwick. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bartscherer, Thomas (2007), “The Spectacle of Suffering: On Tragedy in Nietzsche’s Daybreak”, PhaenEx: Revue de théorie et culture existentialistes et phénomenologiques, Journal of existential and phenomenological culture, 1 (2): 71-93.
Därmann, Iris (2005), “Rausch als “asthetischer Zustand”. Nietzsches Deutung der Aristotelischen Katharsis und ihre Platonisch-Kantische Umdeutung durch Heidegger”, Nietzsche-Studien, 34: 124-62.
Gagarin, Michael, and Paul Woodruff (1995), ed. and trans. Early Greek Political Thought from Homer to the Sophists, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Halliwell, Stephen (1986), Aristotle’s Poetics, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
— (2002) The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe (1993), The Subject of Philosophy, trans Thomas Trezise. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
Most, Glenn W. (2009), “Nietzsche gegen Aristoteles mit Aristoteles”, in Martin Vöhler and Dirck Linck (eds), Grenzen der Katharsis in den modernen Künsten: Transformationen des aristotelischen Modells seit Bernays, Nietzsche und Freud, Berlin and New York: De Gruyter: 51-62.
Müller, Karl Otfried (1833), Aeschylos, Eumeniden: Griechisch und Deutsch mit erläuternden Abhandlungen über die äussere Darstellung und über den Inhalt und die Composition dieser Tragödie. Göttingen: Dieterisch.
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1967), The Birth of Tragedy, and The Case of Wagner, trans. Walter Kaufmann. New York: Vintage Books.
— (1997), Daybreak: Thoughts on the Prejudices of Morality, ed. Maudemarie Clark and Brian Leiter; trans. R. J. Hollingdale, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
— (1988), Sämtliche Briefe, Kritische Studienausgabe, ed. by Giorgio Colli and Mazzino Montinari, München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag / Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, vol. 2? [I don’t have KSB with me, sorry; shd be v. 2].
— (1988), Sämtliche Werke. Kritische Studienausgabe, ed. by Giorgio Colli and Mazzino Montinari, München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag / Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, vol. 2.
— (1990), Twilight of the Idols, and The Anti-Christ, trans. R. J. Hollingdale. London and New York: Penguin Books.
— (1996), Human, All Too Human: A Book for Free Spirits, trans. R. J. Hollingdale, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
— (1999), The Birth of Tragedy and Other Writings, ed. by Raymond Geuss and Ronald Speirs, trans. Ronald Speirs, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
— (2001). The Gay Science: With a Prelude in German Rhymes and an Appendix of Songs. ed. Bernard Williams. Trans. Josefine Nauckhoff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press..
— (2005), The Anti-Christ, Ecce Homo, Twilight of the Idols, and Other Writings, ed. by Aaron Ridley and Judith Norman, trans. Judith Norman, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
— (2006) On the Genealogy of Morality. Trans. Carol Dieth. ed. Keith Ansell-Pearson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press..
Porter, James I. (2000a), The Invention of Dionysus: An Essay on “The Birth of Tragedy”, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
— (2000b), Nietzsche and the Philology of the Future, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
— (2014), “Nietzsche’s Radical Philology,” in Anthony K. Jensen and Helmut Heit (eds), Nietzsche as a Scholar of Antiquity, New York and London: Bloomsbury Academic: 27-50.
— (2015), “Jacob Bernays and the Catharsis of Modernity,” in Joshua Billings and Miriam Leonard (eds), Tragedy and the Idea of Modernity, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 15-41.
Silk, M. S., and J. P. Stern, (1981), Nietzsche on Tragedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ugolini, Gherardo (2012), Jacob Bernays e l’interpretazione medica della catarsi tragica. Verona: Cierre Grafica.
Winckelmann, Johann Joachim (1825-29), Johann Winckelmanns sämtliche Werke: Einzige vollständige Ausgabe, ed. by Joseph Eiselein, 12 vols, Donaueschingen: Verlag deutscher Klassiker.
— (1972), Geschichte der Kunst des Altertums. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
— [1755] (1985), “Thoughts on the Imitation of the Painting and Sculpture of the Greeks”, in H. B. Nisbet (ed.), Aesthetic and Literary Criticism: Winckelmann, Lessing, Hamann, Herder, Schiller, Goethe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 32-54.

Downloads

Published

2016-07-04